You need a refresher in logic. I knew a great priest who had tried heroin in the 1960s. By your logic, the heroine turned him into a wonderful priest. He would certainly tell you that trying heroin was stupid.
Playing Russian Roulette is harmless to five out of six players.
>”You need a refresher in logic.”
“The definition of LOGIC: sensible argument and thought: sensible rational thought and argument rather than ideas that are influenced by emotion or whim.”
By comparing the drug heroine, which is a tangible substance, to a childs game, which you are emotionally afraid of, you are literally comparing apples to oranges.
No one is going to dispute that the drug is physically addictive and damaging, yet there is simply no evidence that the ouija board causes any kind of harm/damage.
If you can present me with any kind of physical evidence that the ouija board causes physical/emotional harm, I’ll admit I’m wrong. (BTW, do I need to offer that I can present you with evidence about heroine?)