Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mountainlion; SunkenCiv

Humans and neanderthals inter-bred. The “caucasoid” population encompassing the region from Europe to northern India have elements of neanderthal genetics, AFAIK.


15 posted on 01/18/2010 2:02:42 PM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: James C. Bennett

That explains a few knuckle draggers I have meet....


18 posted on 01/18/2010 2:08:56 PM PST by njslim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett
Humans and neanderthals inter-bred. The “caucasoid” population encompassing the region from Europe to northern India have elements of neanderthal genetics, AFAIK.

If there was interbreeding the DNA would shave shown that which it did not.

20 posted on 01/18/2010 2:15:27 PM PST by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett; mountainlion; seowulf
Hey, thanks, James, that reminds me:
The Neandertal Enigma
by James Shreeve

in local libraries
Frayer's own reading of the record reveals a number of overlooked traits that clearly and specifically link the Neandertals to the Cro-Magnons. One such trait is the shape of the opening of the nerve canal in the lower jaw, a spot where dentists often give a pain-blocking injection. In many Neandertal, the upper portion of the opening is covered by a broad bony ridge, a curious feature also carried by a significant number of Cro-Magnons. But none of the alleged 'ancestors of us all' fossils from Africa have it, and it is extremely rare in modern people outside Europe." [pp 126-127]
I can't believe I forgot that.

Mountainlion, there has been no disproving of any genetic relationship between living humans and Neandertal, neither has there been any disproving of interbreeding. The first such study used pre-Neandertal remains to try to replicate mitochondrial DNA, and fewer than 300 base pairs (out of a presumed 16,000+ originally) made the trip. That isn't an adequate sample to show anything. The recent study didn't use a massive database of Neandertal DNA either, it used reconstructed (iow, surmised) DNA sequences which were then attributed to Neandertal. It was what's known as a straw man argument.

Thanks seowulf, that's nice, I hope that's appeared in a topic of its own.
27 posted on 01/18/2010 3:19:30 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson