Replies

My work is in a field which is considerably more abstract and human-centric than UFOlogy. It is concerned with the symbolic representation of emotional and perceptual constructs in linguistics. The interpretation of these linguistic contructs relies upon certain suppositions regarding the nature of human consciousness, time, and what I call the "adaptive taxonomy of the unknown" (ATU). ATU is the process by which new concepts "intrude" into representation in a language. Examples would include terms like "laser", "cable", and "text", which have come to efficiently represent things that are very novel and/or emotionally significant and widespread in the timeline of history.

The more significant a concept is at the emotional level, the deeper impact it has on the conscious and sub-conscious mind.

It is statistically demonstrable that events and things of significant emotional impact can make impressions on the subconscious at varying times before they occur. Precognition, fortune telling, dreams of future events, and "prophecy" are all facets of the same universal experience of humankind regardless of cultural or religious environment.

Seeing parts of the future, though darkly and as filtered through our own symbolic processing array (neurons, notions, experiences and linguistics), seems to be common, if ephemeral and non-deterministic, human experience.

Why all this background? So that you have some idea of why I believe you should absorb and contemplate what Quix is saying.

Words means things. Sometimes, new events and things come into human conscious experience which have no words or previous frame of reference available to describe them. A Kalahari tribesman seeing an airplane would probably percieve the event in terms of a large bird in action due to the similarity of shape and function. But how would that tribeman perceive a cellphone? Or a space shuttle launch? Or an HDTV playing Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan?

Without a frame of reference or contextual grammar, he would be literally speechless. Perhaps he'd speak of "wheels withing wheels", but what if he'd yet to encounter the wheel? The event would certainly have a significant emotional impact, perhaps of fear, perhaps of wonder or a combination.

I'll skip to the conclusion here, as I have hopefully supplied enough background conceptual imagery to give context to my comment here.

It is possible to scan, collect, catagorize, and "reverse engineer" future events from sub-conscious shifts in linguistic structures used on the Internet. Let's skip the details, it's technical (and irrelevent). Suffice to say that a statistically valid preview of future events (or more accurately, *perceptions* of future events, and this is an important distinction) is possible to construct using this methodology and technology.

There are emotionally significant events coming up on the blurry time horizon which are both terrifying and beautiful. It is hard to distinguish what, which, and in what order, because the technology used gives one a view similar to looking out a car windshield at night in fog going 100mph. There is little detail, but things get clearer as you approach them.

Two of the things which have been seen to be approaching and are becomming clearer with each pass through the technology are massive earth changes (tectonics, polar magnetics, etc.), and, here it comes:

Alien contact and conflict.

Again, what the technology does is capture sub-conscious perceptions of events with significant emotional content before they actually occur, rather like detecting the first tremor before the tsunami hits. It is difficult to separate "scary thoughts" from "scary events being thought about", but that's where we are now.

And it points to several events which do not have current corrlections in existing language structures. "Alien", "space", "non-Earth humanity", and "war", as well as a vast amount of "misc/no catagory" entires are what is showing up.

It's vast, new, and causing shockwaves traveling back in time to us, here, now from the relatively immediate future.

Now I'm going to take twice my normal medication, polish my tin foil hat, sit in my pyramid-shaped toolshed, and re-read "Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There" while listenting to Black Sabbath's "Into the Void" on vinyl at 78 speed. Backwards.

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

You humble me profoundly with your kind words and excellent post.

One rather slight quibble . . .

I do not think we know . . . probably even that we cannot know this side of eternity unless God tells one of us . . .

exactly what

the software is doing.

We do not KNOW that it is picking anything up from human subconscious; collective unconscious—as though there were such a thing; from future consciousness; from demonic forces; from a spiritual dimension; from a timeless dimension; from leaks from an advanced future archive . . .

or what.

imho . . . FWIW! . . .

We just “know” that it is picking up things which have varying degrees of predictive potency and validity.

Certainly that IS interesting . . . and worth paying some attention to.

Your explanation sounds PLAUSIBLE enough . . . but I think would be more accurately labeled conjecture vs certainty.

I won't comment on Quix's specifics here, simply because I don't consider myself qualified to endorse or refute them. I will say I am familiar with the same (or at least a subset of) body of work Quix draws his conclusions from, and am aware of no data or theological "facts" to the contrary that would invalidate any of his deductions or conclusions. They may seem odd or extraordinary, but so do DNA and super nova explosions which form the metals and carbon compounds which allow us to build screens and keyboards. My work is in a field which is considerably more abstract and human-centric than UFOlogy. It is concerned with the symbolic representation of emotional and perceptual constructs in linguistics. The interpretation of these linguistic contructs relies upon certain suppositions regarding the nature of human consciousness, time, and what I call the "adaptive taxonomy of the unknown" (ATU). ATU is the process by which new concepts "intrude" into representation in a language. Examples would include terms like "laser", "cable", and "text", which have come to efficiently represent things that are very novel and/or emotionally significant and widespread in the timeline of history. The more significant a concept is at the emotional level, the deeper impact it has on the conscious and sub-conscious mind. It is statistically demonstrable that events and things of significant emotional impact can make impressions on the subconscious at varying times before they occur. Precognition, fortune telling, dreams of future events, and "prophecy" are all facets of the same universal experience of humankind regardless of cultural or religious environment. Seeing parts of the future, though darkly and as filtered through our own symbolic processing array (neurons, notions, experiences and linguistics), seems to be common, if ephemeral and non-deterministic, human experience. Why all this background? So that you have some idea of why I believe you should absorb and contemplate what Quix is saying. Words means things. Sometimes, new events and things come into human conscious experience which have no words or previous frame of reference available to describe them. A Kalahari tribesman seeing an airplane would probably percieve the event in terms of a large bird in action due to the similarity of shape and function. But how would that tribeman perceive a cellphone? Or a space shuttle launch? Or an HDTV playing Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan? Without a frame of reference or contextual grammar, he would be literally speechless. Perhaps he'd speak of "wheels withing wheels", but what if he'd yet to encounter the wheel? The event would certainly have a significant emotional impact, perhaps of fear, perhaps of wonder or a combination. I'll skip to the conclusion here, as I have hopefully supplied enough background conceptual imagery to give context to my comment here. It is possible to scan, collect, catagorize, and "reverse engineer" future events from sub-conscious shifts in linguistic structures used on the Internet. Let's skip the details, it's technical (and irrelevent). Suffice to say that a statistically valid preview of future events (or more accurately, *perceptions* of future events, and this is an important distinction) is possible to construct using this methodology and technology. There are emotionally significant events coming up on the blurry time horizon which are both terrifying and beautiful. It is hard to distinguish what, which, and in what order, because the technology used gives one a view similar to looking out a car windshield at night in fog going 100mph. There is little detail, but things get clearer as you approach them. Two of the things which have been seen to be approaching and are becomming clearer with each pass through the technology are massive earth changes (tectonics, polar magnetics, etc.), and, here it comes: Alien contact and conflict. Again, what the technology does is capture sub-conscious perceptions of events with significant emotional content before they actually occur, rather like detecting the first tremor before the tsunami hits. It is difficult to separate "scary thoughts" from "scary events being thought about", but that's where we are now. And it points to several events which do not have current corrlections in existing language structures. "Alien", "space", "non-Earth humanity", and "war", as well as a vast amount of "misc/no catagory" entires are what is showing up. It's vast, new, and causing shockwaves traveling back in time to us, here, now from the relatively immediate future. Now I'm going to take twice my normal medication, polish my tin foil hat, sit in my pyramid-shaped toolshed, and re-read "Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There" while listenting to Black Sabbath's "Into the Void" on vinyl at 78 speed. Backwards.

I thoroughly enjoyed reading this....I must be crazy