U.S. military is liaising with extraterrestrial life according to independent sources...

Independent sources have claimed an on-going set of face-to-face meetings between U.S. military officials and extraterrestrial life.

The sources reveal that senior U.S. Navy officers have played a leading role in an inter-services working group responsible for the meetings, and that different extraterrestrial groups are allegedly involved.

One source claims that the contact involves extraterrestrial groups known as Reptilians, and a silicon based life form dubbed ‘the Conformers’.

Another source claims that the extraterrestrials are called Ebens from the Zeta Reticuli star system, but known colloquially as the Grays. A third source claims that human looking extraterrestrials representing an association of star nations are liaising with military officials. Two of the sources have been interviewed by this writer who has been aware of their claims for more than a year, and finds them credible.

The similarities in these independent reports gives reason to conclude that an ongoing program of secret meetings involving senior military personal from the U.S. Navy and other military services with one or more extraterrestrial civilizations is underway.

One source claiming to have participated in face-to-face meetings is a serving U.S. Navy officer that in February 2008 revealed the existence of a confidential set of meetings at the UN where UFOs and extraterrestrial life were discussed. Known as Source A, the Navy officer claims that he was sanctioned by a working group comprising a number of admirals to disclose the UN talks without revealing his identity.

In June 2008, Source A claims he was assigned to another project that involved direct meetings with two groups of extraterrestrials in a covert project where he was sanctioned to board their spacecraft on three different occasions. One group is a Reptilian looking species, and another is a silicon based life form he dubbed the ‘Conformers’.

This author and a number of other researchers have met with and interviewed Source A, and have been able to confirm that he is a serving U.S. Navy officer. Recently, two New York based UFO investigators, Clay and Shawn Pickering, gave a three hour interview concerning Source A’s involvement in a covert project involving face-to-face meetings with extraterrestrial life.

They revealed that a covert inter-services working group has attempted to brief President Obama about the extraterrestrial liaison project. Given Source A’s identity and unlikelihood that more senior U.S. Navy officials would sanction a serving officer to openly misinform the general public over extraterrestrial life, there is reason to take his claims of participating in a covert project involving face-to-face meetings very seriously.

An anonymous source associated with the Defense Intelligence Agency recently claimed that military officials on November 12, 2009, met with extraterrestrials called Ebens, from the Zeta Reticula star system, on Akau Atoll in the Johnston Islands. The alleged meeting was part of an ongoing set of diplomatic discussions and exchanges that date several decades. The information was the latest installment related to an alleged classified project called Serpo, a secret exchange program with extraterrestrial visitors from Zeta Reticulum. According to Victor Martinez, who maintains a large email list where he distributes Project Serpo reports released to him by ‘anonymous’:

… the Ebens met on Akau Island with a total of 18 representatives from the U.S., United Nations, Russia, China, the Vatican and certain other guests. U.S. representatives are said to have included five military personnel, two intelligence officers, one linguist and one person representing the Obama administration.

The Johnston Islands are a U.S. territory and lie 750 miles south west of Honolulu. That places the Islands directly under the military authority of Pacific Command that historically has been run by the U.S. Navy. Although the latest Project Serpo release does not identify the service of the five military personnel at the alleged meeting, the choice of Johnston Atoll suggests a leading role for U.S. Navy officials in the latest face-to-face meeting

You humble me profoundly with your kind words and excellent post.

One rather slight quibble . . .

I do not think we know . . . probably even that we cannot know this side of eternity unless God tells one of us . . .

exactly what

the software is doing.

We do not KNOW that it is picking anything up from human subconscious; collective unconscious—as though there were such a thing; from future consciousness; from demonic forces; from a spiritual dimension; from a timeless dimension; from leaks from an advanced future archive . . .

or what.

imho . . . FWIW! . . .

We just “know” that it is picking up things which have varying degrees of predictive potency and validity.

Certainly that IS interesting . . . and worth paying some attention to.

Your explanation sounds PLAUSIBLE enough . . . but I think would be more accurately labeled conjecture vs certainty.

Thanks bro, and you are absolutely correct.

...Your explanation sounds PLAUSIBLE enough . . . but I think would be more accurately labeled conjecture vs certainty.

Oh, there's nothing certain about it. I'm still in the data capture and analysis phase.

Technically, it's a hypothesis from which I am hoping to derive a theory by using finer and finer grained falsifiability.

The primary derivative conjecture is that either there is cognitive information bleed-through across various universes in the multiverse (violating current M Theory), or it's a hidden variable quantum mechanical equation (also ugly and unlikely). A third possibility is that it has nothing to do with either of those previously stated possibilities.

Sigh. Science is comprised mostly of trying to prove yourself wrong about everything.

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

I won't comment on Quix's specifics here, simply because I don't consider myself qualified to endorse or refute them. I will say I am familiar with the same (or at least a subset of) body of work Quix draws his conclusions from, and am aware of no data or theological "facts" to the contrary that would invalidate any of his deductions or conclusions. They may seem odd or extraordinary, but so do DNA and super nova explosions which form the metals and carbon compounds which allow us to build screens and keyboards. My work is in a field which is considerably more abstract and human-centric than UFOlogy. It is concerned with the symbolic representation of emotional and perceptual constructs in linguistics. The interpretation of these linguistic contructs relies upon certain suppositions regarding the nature of human consciousness, time, and what I call the "adaptive taxonomy of the unknown" (ATU). ATU is the process by which new concepts "intrude" into representation in a language. Examples would include terms like "laser", "cable", and "text", which have come to efficiently represent things that are very novel and/or emotionally significant and widespread in the timeline of history. The more significant a concept is at the emotional level, the deeper impact it has on the conscious and sub-conscious mind. It is statistically demonstrable that events and things of significant emotional impact can make impressions on the subconscious at varying times before they occur. Precognition, fortune telling, dreams of future events, and "prophecy" are all facets of the same universal experience of humankind regardless of cultural or religious environment. Seeing parts of the future, though darkly and as filtered through our own symbolic processing array (neurons, notions, experiences and linguistics), seems to be common, if ephemeral and non-deterministic, human experience. Why all this background? So that you have some idea of why I believe you should absorb and contemplate what Quix is saying. Words means things. Sometimes, new events and things come into human conscious experience which have no words or previous frame of reference available to describe them. A Kalahari tribesman seeing an airplane would probably percieve the event in terms of a large bird in action due to the similarity of shape and function. But how would that tribeman perceive a cellphone? Or a space shuttle launch? Or an HDTV playing Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan? Without a frame of reference or contextual grammar, he would be literally speechless. Perhaps he'd speak of "wheels withing wheels", but what if he'd yet to encounter the wheel? The event would certainly have a significant emotional impact, perhaps of fear, perhaps of wonder or a combination. I'll skip to the conclusion here, as I have hopefully supplied enough background conceptual imagery to give context to my comment here. It is possible to scan, collect, catagorize, and "reverse engineer" future events from sub-conscious shifts in linguistic structures used on the Internet. Let's skip the details, it's technical (and irrelevent). Suffice to say that a statistically valid preview of future events (or more accurately, *perceptions* of future events, and this is an important distinction) is possible to construct using this methodology and technology. There are emotionally significant events coming up on the blurry time horizon which are both terrifying and beautiful. It is hard to distinguish what, which, and in what order, because the technology used gives one a view similar to looking out a car windshield at night in fog going 100mph. There is little detail, but things get clearer as you approach them. Two of the things which have been seen to be approaching and are becomming clearer with each pass through the technology are massive earth changes (tectonics, polar magnetics, etc.), and, here it comes: Alien contact and conflict. Again, what the technology does is capture sub-conscious perceptions of events with significant emotional content before they actually occur, rather like detecting the first tremor before the tsunami hits. It is difficult to separate "scary thoughts" from "scary events being thought about", but that's where we are now. And it points to several events which do not have current corrlections in existing language structures. "Alien", "space", "non-Earth humanity", and "war", as well as a vast amount of "misc/no catagory" entires are what is showing up. It's vast, new, and causing shockwaves traveling back in time to us, here, now from the relatively immediate future. Now I'm going to take twice my normal medication, polish my tin foil hat, sit in my pyramid-shaped toolshed, and re-read "Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There" while listenting to Black Sabbath's "Into the Void" on vinyl at 78 speed. Backwards.

I thoroughly enjoyed reading this....I must be crazy

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.