Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dem Guard
As for these ground application accomplishments I think they would have been developed anyway.

No question of that. But at a substantially slower pace.

I don't mind paying extra for the space program. It has a far better purpose and rate of return than welfare, the EPA and the Department of Education to name a few. And those programs cost us more than five bucks a year.

Just my two cents.

37 posted on 12/21/2009 5:19:17 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: buccaneer81
The biggest problem I see is that for the last 25 years "manned space exploration" has consisted of flying over and over into LEO so that the "explorers" can twist some bolts on another piece of orbital hardware, or push the button to start an experiment showing how earthworms have sex in zero-G.

Not that our astronauts don't have skill and guts, I admire them and would ride up there with them in a second.

But "exploration" it ain't.

47 posted on 12/21/2009 5:30:21 PM PST by Notary Sojac ("Goldman Sachs" is to "US economy" as "lamprey" is to "lake trout")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: buccaneer81
I respect your view. I think you can also see how many applications in computer technology, software, communications, medicine, flight, and defense have been developed without being attributed directly to space travel. This is why I believe the benefits from space travel have been a bit over stated in mho.
51 posted on 12/21/2009 5:36:47 PM PST by Dem Guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson