To: SunkenCiv
It always amazes me how the conventional (lack of) thinking puts huge gaps between, for example, humans in Australia and humans in the Pacific. Flores Island, 800K years ago, then nothing for 750,000 years, then Australia, then not a move for another 46,000 years, then the Pacific. And for that matter, 7 million years ago near Lake Chad (sez some), no one budges, 6,300,000 years go by, Heidelbergensis in Asia.
I have noticed that as well. What amazes me is that humans supposedly didn't spread out for thousands and thousands of years. I know there are huge mountain ranges and glaciers etc..., but I still find it amazing that the conventional thinking is that they stayed in one place for SO long. You would think curiosity alone would have driven them to explore all parts of the earth, as long as life was sustainable where they went.
10 posted on
12/17/2009 8:23:27 PM PST by
Jessarah
To: Jessarah
11 posted on
12/17/2009 9:33:09 PM PST by
blam
To: Jessarah
It’s particularly ridiculous when one considers that so many animal species did so, and humans are much more adaptable.
14 posted on
12/18/2009 6:30:07 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(My Sunday Feeling is that Nothing is easy. Goes for the rest of the week too.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson