Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The basic redress for abuses in the past I can understand, but it looks like the FTC is going a bit far. This is especially true for Intel’s higher-end GPU projects. Intel isn’t even a real player in that market, and they have every right to get into it. If, big IF, Intel has anti-competitive conduct down the road with GPUs, that can be settled then. Intel already knows the FTC is watching, so it would be dumb to try anything monopolistic like saying they’ll only sell CPUs to OEMs if they carry Intel GPUs too, or commit dumping again.

Preemptive anti-monopoly actions don’t make any sense.`


4 posted on 12/17/2009 11:34:53 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat

See the note about the ION and Intel’s refusal to sell the ATOM processor to Nvidia.


5 posted on 12/17/2009 12:08:38 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson