Posted on 12/03/2009 12:13:42 PM PST by Justaham
There is always more to the story, but so far I only see a very ugly scenario coming from Woods.
He was having multiple sexual encounters with various women over the past few years while the wife was home and pregnant.
Like a FRiend stated previously, it is the ultimate betrayal to cheat on the wife while she is pregnant with your baby.
I am not a fan of her beating him with the golf clubs, but hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
If anything, men should be learning from this to never cheat on their wives.
Woods is lucky to be alive given what the wife could have done to him.
1 mistake could maybe be forgiven (though not by me). But at least 3 of them, and one of them 20+ times?????
That is not a mistake nor a transgression; it is a behavior which probably will never revert back to fidelity.....seldom does.
Scumbag who cannot be trusted.
Yep..from now on, I’ll cheer for Phil M....Tiger ..it will be interesting to see how he is received once he is on the links again...if he is..
I hear refunds are being given for the tourney this weekend in CA..
Maybe she does not divorce him because of the turmoil this brings to the children or maybe for religious factors. I have seen a couple of cases first hand where divorce devastated the children and caused them tremendous pain. Divorce would be simple only if no children are involved.
Really, a Billion dollars for playing Golf ? When you have the money that Tiger has and will have. What he will pay these women means nothing. He can buy anyone or anything. This will only add to his popularity,just like it did for Letterman. A different time & a different day Folks. America is a sick puppy.
I really don’t know why the people here miss the fact that a marriage starting off with a prenup was never a match made in heaven. If your husband has to give you millions, and if you have to agree not to take all his millions, isn’t it obvious everyone was not assuming trust here?
If you get to marry one of the richest guys in the world but everyone agrees yopu can’t have ALL his money, somebody was assuming somebody might cheat, walk out or whatever.
The wife is a trophy wife. Duh. Tiger is a world class rich stud. Duh. Unless I get to have a long talk with them, which isn’t happening, I am not giving out any angel/devil coupons to either of them.
After the wife shakes him down for more millions, what moral high ground will she be on then? Sorry, I don’t line up with those who believe she “deserves” millions or to wack his brain with a golf club. Maybe if she killed him she’d be facing a murder rap now.
I think you meant to say...STD
Why are all your harsh words only directed at the one who was cheated on?????
Why can’t you read, my last post totally said I am not giving either one of them a blue ribbon.
Affairs are bad.
Smashing someone unconscious and into a tree is bad. (Please do not be so childish as to think deadly assault is justified by a marital problem).
I said prenups are a sign of expected trouble.
I said getting paid money to stay in a marriage is bad. Certainly not romantic or moral. Same goes for the one paying the money.
I said he’s a wealthy stud and she’s a trophy. Get back to me when they each marry an intelligent but loving chubby person next time and neither one wants a dime.
Well, if someone of means (like Paul McCartney) enters into a marriage without a pre-nup just to prove his love, someone like Heather Mills willl demand $250 Mil when the divorce comes, and the court awarded her “only” $48.7 mil. after Sir Paul offered her a settlement of about that much. See
http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2008/03/17/paul-mccartney-divorce-settlement-487-million/
“’Til death do us part” has become a sad joke. States could abolish divorces altogether.
Or avoid matrimony, but as Clint Eastwood found out he had to pay Sandra Locke “palimony” for shacking up.
Your post has me laughing so hard I can’t stop!!!!
Bingo. And what a shock that these marriages don’t last.
As for the people who think it’s “OK” to smash someone’s head in over an affair, I don’t think any jurisdiction recognizes a “crime of passion” defense.
In the countries where they do allow that nonsense, I believe jealous husbands use it to shoot unfaithful wives to death.
Here we call it murder, as we should.
IMHO the wife did not show herself to be all that innocent when she (luckily for her) almost killed him. That is not love folks.
Nor is the current multi player shakedown that is in progress.
Divorce is the only crime, that I know of, that your net worth dictates the sentence and penalties.
Tiger should’a played his 1/2 race card. lol
Red - If you think these comments are harsh, check out what some have to say about Heather Mills in the McCartney article I link above! Yikes!
There is always “jury nullification” and the idea that “not a jury in the world would convict her”, etc. Did Lorena Bobbitt serve any time? I mean she not only removed the member, but tossed it out of her car window. Cold.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_and_Lorena_Bobbitt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.