Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Godzilla

Actually, the link doesn’t refute the argument at all. It provides context within which the calculation works. I have no issue with the analysis at all, after all, pi=3 is incorrect. However, the context requires an interpretation of the biblical text—the text does not stand as inerrant on its own.

I am, therfore, correct.


653 posted on 11/28/2009 8:40:35 AM PST by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies ]


To: Buck W.

Love the arrogance. Please provide the specific Hebrew text from the passage that states that Pi=3 (crickets) The context requires the application of COMMON SENSE and since the passage doesn’t even mention Pi to begin with, it is nothing but a false comparison.

Yet go ahead and continue to claim the bible say Pi=3.


673 posted on 11/28/2009 9:23:56 AM PST by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies ]

To: Buck W.; Godzilla
However, the context requires an interpretation of the biblical text—the text does not stand as inerrant on its own.

Did I call it, Godzilla?

Now, it's time to deny the truth of other passages of Scripture that he finds inconvenient to his belief system.

730 posted on 11/28/2009 10:59:24 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson