[Buck W.]

You certainly have trouble with reading comprehension. My query is NOT in regard to what the third party sources say—I can read that myself. I am asking what the individual poster believes.

Really, you’re not adding much and are just making yourself look silly by displaying certain unseemly pedantic affectations.

[Colofornian]

You certainly have trouble with reading comprehension. My query is NOT in regard to what the third party sources say—I can read that myself. I am asking what the individual poster believes.

You have overwhelming reading comp issues. Here, I'll help you out...it's obvious that in my citing the context of your comment (see #185), I overwhelmed you. I'll narrow down to 7 words what my RESPONSE in #185 was to: I’ll give you my answer: I don’t.

There. (As you can see I WASN'T responding to those other "individual posters" were a postin'. In regard to my #185 post, who cares what those other "individual posters'" personal opinions were? (I wasn't responding to them now was I?)
Nor was I responding to "what the third party sources" said (now was I?)

I was responding to you -- about your comment -- that YOU don't think Ldsism is a cult.

There. Comprende?

[reaganaut]

Really, you’re not adding much and are just making yourself look silly by displaying certain unseemly pedantic affectations.

- - - - - -
Actually, sir, it is you rather than Colofornian who is making themselves “look silly”. Your haughtiness betrays your insecurity.