No Mr. Thomas is deliberately misstating the article to give a false impression.
Now you can try to dance around that and change the subject or try to redefine words but that will not change the facts.
(oop’s my bad, I hit the wring key)
You can keep saying that but that doesn’t make it so and of course nothing you’ve said would indicate it is.
So what is said means something else and what is not said means what you and only you are able to discern.
But will you address the substance of the article? No.
Ira knows what the authors and researchers meant and their intentions no matter what they say. Right.
Don’t stop now, I can’t wait to hear more.
And more graphics too. Those are the best part of your comments. Really!
Redundant.