[drjimmy]

Okay, so the Court believes Sinclair, who claims to have been Obama’s homosexual lover. Does that mean that we can believe Sinclair when he tells us that he was Obama’s homosexual lover?

The judge didn't make his ruling based on Sinclair's affidavit, so there was no finding of whether Sinclair's claims about Taitz are factual. He dismissed the case because his court lacks the jurisdiction to rule on a case intended to unseat a sitting president.

[El Gato]

The judge didn't make his ruling based on Sinclair's affidavit, so there was no finding of whether Sinclair's claims about Taitz are factual.

True, but that also means he should not have mentioned it in his ruling. Especially considering that the afidavit had never been entered into evidence, and Mrs. Taitz never got a chance to challenge its contents.