BTW, Did you read the link I provided? Did you happen to notice the circular reasoning the evos based the mitochondrial clock on? Did you happen to notice the date range they gave to the mitochondrial eve once they recalibrated the mitochondrial clock based on empirically observed mutation rates?
As I said, if "creation scientists" have been saying what you say they are saying for years, i.e. that the rate is wrong, and there is sound data for accepting a different "standard" rate of genetic mutation then there is no argument between "creation scientists" and the normal scientific community at all.
However, you are being disingenuous. I.e. you are a liar and a fraud because that is not what "creationists" believe it all. They don't believe that the those biologists who use the theory of evolution as a working hypothesis got some details wrong. They toss out the entire hypothesis altogether.