Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777
Just for the sake of argument, Barack Obama posted his Certification of Live Birth on the internet over a year ago for the entire world to see. That document contained ALL of the constitutionally required information: Place of birth in the US and age over 35 years old.

Well, that's good news!

Since the above "document contain(s) ALL of the constitutionally required information," as you say, then he should simply bring it into the appropriate court -- where those "silly" birthers are challenging him -- and show it to the Judge and allow a panel of experts to authenticate it.

And, by all means, bring a statement by Fukino too!

It would be a lot cheaper than spending hundreds of thousands in legal fees fighting discovery not to mention all the unessary court time being wasted on an issue he could so EASILY address -- don't you think?

The above would seem, to a reasonable person, to be the most straightforward way to handle those pesky "birthers" -- don't you think?

Oh, and did I mention how much cheaper it would be?

Some of those kooky birthers have even gone so far as to say that he may be hiding something!!

Now why would ANYONE think that?

STE=Q STE=Q

88 posted on 11/11/2009 10:40:08 PM PST by STE=Q ("It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government" ... Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: STE=Q

Well, that’s good news!

Since the above “document contain(s) ALL of the constitutionally required information,” as you say, then he should simply bring it into the appropriate court — where those “silly” birthers are challenging him — and show it to the Judge and allow a panel of experts to authenticate it.

And, by all means, bring a statement by Fukino too!

It would be a lot cheaper than spending hundreds of thousands in legal fees fighting discovery not to mention all the unessary court time being wasted on an issue he could so EASILY address — don’t you think?

The above would seem, to a reasonable person, to be the most straightforward way to handle those pesky “birthers” — don’t you think?

Oh, and did I mention how much cheaper it would be?

Some of those kooky birthers have even gone so far as to say that he may be hiding something!!

Now why would ANYONE think that?

STE=Q STE=Q


Would you trust any document brought to a court by Obama?

The Attorney General of the state of Hawaii, Mark Bennett (a Republican, by the way) has the statutory authority to subpoena Barack Obama’s original, long form, vault copy birth records and the power to convene a Grand Jury to examine them with expert testimony. Prosecuting attorneys convene Grand Juries to go on legal “fishing expeditions” all the time. Thus far Attorney General Bennett has not chosen to go that route. My point of view is that pressure should be brought to bear on the Hawaii Attorney General to seek such a subpoena.

Since January 20, 2009 all Obama’s eligibility related legal expenses are paid for by the taxpaying citizens of the United States of America. Haven’t you noticed that the US Justice Department is the defense team preparing the Motions to Dismiss in every federal lawsuit?

When Phil Berg’s suit which did name Obama (Berg v Obama) was sent to Justice Souter for a Writ of Certiorari, the Obama legal team did not even file a response to Berg’s suit. By not filing a response they were in fact saying, “we’re ok with the Justices deciding this issue on their own without any input from us.” Thus no legal expenses.

The birthers thought that Justice Souter had given Obama a deadline to produce his birth certificate. In reality Justice Souter gave Obama the opportunity to file a response to Berg’s suit which Obama chose not to do. The Supreme Court denied Berg’s request for a Writ of Certiorari which means that four Justices could not be found out of the nine to agree to hear Berg’s case before the full court.

Prior to January 20th, most of the lawsuits didn’t even name Obama as a defendant, so no legal expenses for him. For example, Allan Keyes’ original suit was the case of “Bowen v Lightfoot.” The suit was against California’s Secretary of State. Leo Donofrio’s suit was “Donofrio v Wells”. Another eligibility case that went to the Supreme Court was “Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz.” You don’t have to spend any money when you are not even named as a defendant.

Thus far 54 Obama eligibility related legal actions have been denied or dismissed by courts at the state, federal and Supreme Court levels. From Obama’s point of view, I am certain that his legal advisors have told him to simply let the legal system work its will with the remaining outstanding 7 legal actions. If some court should order release of his original birth records at some future date, he would then have to comply.
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/docket/


90 posted on 11/12/2009 10:16:50 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson