Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

Thank you for your reply, Non-Sequitur!

Just one more point, please:

I said: “Don’t you agree that he should show his Birth certificate — as outlined above?”

You said:

“Nothing requires that he do so.”
__________________________________________________________

I could be wrong but your answer seems a tad evasive.

I asked you if you thought he SHOULD show his Birth certificate, not whether you thought he could be legally compelled to show it.

Let me put it another way:

Would you at least agree with me that showing his birth certificate would be the proper and ethical thing — the noble thing — for him to do?

STE=Q


69 posted on 11/10/2009 7:46:34 PM PST by STE=Q ("It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government" ... Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: STE=Q

NS wants zero to stay right where he is.


71 posted on 11/10/2009 8:50:14 PM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: STE=Q
I asked you if you thought he SHOULD show his Birth certificate, not whether you thought he could be legally compelled to show it.

Why should he when it isn't required? Bush didn't. Clinton didn't. No prior president has had to. If the law required it then I'd say that Obama should provide it. Since the law does not then I don't think he should be forced to do what no other president has had to do. Unless, of course, actual evidence is uncovered indicating that Obama wasn't born here.

74 posted on 11/11/2009 4:12:39 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson