[Natural Born 54]

Just read the motion for reconsideration and have the following observations/questions:

1. She did a credible job pointing out all of the judges mistakes. I am not qualified to know if her points of law were all correct but she wrote it well enough for me to follow it and relate it to the judge’s document. Lost count of the number of times she told the judge he messed up on a point of law or judgement.

2. Yep, she does use a sledgehammer but I find it somewhat refreshing if not entirely politic on her part. She certainly knows how to call a spade an f’ing shovel.

3. Anyone have an opinion as to her contention that “a quo warranto MAY BE issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia...” etc. “The word “may” does not mean exclusive jurisdiction” and that she was right that a quo warranto could be pursued in Carter’s court?

4. Palin is referred to as a barracuda (sarahcuda) based on her determination so I think Orly can best be characterized as a pit bull. She’s chomped onto O’s carcass and can’t be pried off with a crow bar much less a gavel. (No catchy name results from a combination of Orly and pit bull which is too bad.)

[rxsid]

Attorney Apuzzo doesn't think the D.C. courts are the exclusive "venue" for Q.W.

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/quo-warranto-and-kerchner-v-obama-and.html

[Non-Sequitur]

Anyone have an opinion as to her contention that “a quo warranto MAY BE issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia...” etc. “The word “may” does not mean exclusive jurisdiction” and that she was right that a quo warranto could be pursued in Carter’s court?

She's wrong then. The only court that a private citizen can file a writ of quo warranto in is the D.C. District Court.