Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pharmboy
600 hundred years later ACORN is getting around to correcting the census.

French crossbowmen were “completely outclassed” by the English archers, who could send deadly volleys farther and more frequently

The crossbow had a significantly greater range. While the longbow's potential rate of fire provided a vast advantage, the difference was the archer. Without the strength and skill of years of experience, the longbow would have provided little advantage. It was the warriors, not the weapon.

21 posted on 10/25/2009 7:05:50 AM PDT by SJackson (In wine there is wisdom, In beer there is freedom, In water there is bacteria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
Without the strength and skill of years of experience, the longbow would have provided little advantage. It was the warriors, not the weapon.

An Urban Legend perhaps, but I understand that the Brit's two-finger "up yours" gesture arose from the fact that the Frecnch cut those two fingers off of any longbowman they captured so he was henceforth useless. The "up yours" defiance indicated they could still use the longbow.

23 posted on 10/25/2009 8:24:15 AM PDT by Oatka ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson