To: BuffaloJack
“Marriage is a right of man/woman couples and it should stay that way.”
Yes, but why does the givernment need to be involved?
14 posted on
10/23/2009 8:18:10 AM PDT by
Grunthor
(Thank YOU George Bush, for giving us the GOP of today!)
To: Grunthor
On the other hand, if we go the other way.."the only legal status states would confer on couples would be a civil union, which would be a domestic partnership agreement between any two people."
This would be a legal, binding contract between partners so we should then be able to set the "TERMS" of the contract that each party would agree to. i.e. the parties agree to have sex at least three times a week. Party "A" is responsible for paying all the bills. Party "B" is responsible for all domestic support inside the abode. etc etc. Is this what Sunstien is promoting????
21 posted on
10/23/2009 8:25:58 AM PDT by
John.Galt2012
(I'll take Liberty and you can keep the "Change"!)
To: Grunthor
Simple.
The giverment is bunch of marxists with a muslim leader wanting to further attack the great pillar of our society..... Christianity and the family.
All part of the death to America family in the White House.
To: Grunthor
Simple.
The giverment is bunch of marxists with a muslim leader wanting to further attack the great pillar of our society..... Christianity and the family.
All part of the death to America family in the White House.
To: Grunthor
Yes, but why does the givernment need to be involved? Because marriage has significant legal ramifications. Always has, always will.
49 posted on
10/23/2009 9:14:39 AM PDT by
r9etb
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson