I thought the idea or rethinking our political affiliation was well worth the time. Both political parties do not hold up to constitutional measure. With all the anti-BHO sentiment out there, I wanted to restate the concept of conservatism not republicanism.
1 posted on
10/22/2009 8:00:00 AM PDT by
Exmachina
To: Exmachina
We have friends, who are lifelong RATs, who just changed their party affiliation to Independent because they loathe Zero and Pelosi’s RAT party.
To: Exmachina
Better but your flame suit on. The Constitution is just a piece of paper.
3 posted on
10/22/2009 8:08:06 AM PDT by
BGHater
("real price of every thing ... is the toil and trouble of acquiring it")
To: Exmachina
U.S. Native Born have no RIGHT to be named a Natural-born Citizen
The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed previous SCOTUS opinion where no one has the right to be named a Natural-born citizen. Craig v U.S., 2009, 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.
POTUS eligibility is an issue of national security and not a civil right.
Many people have been led to believe all citizens born on US soil, despite parentage, have a Constitutional right to be President. It's not true.
Obama cannot be impeached for his ineligibility because being ineligible in not a crime. Obama can be impeached on fraud and other crimes based on his ineligibility.
The POTUS can be removed if the POTUS has a condition that renders him with the inability to discharge his duties. Being ineligible would fall under this. The Court can't remove POTUS, but it can determine if the POTUS is eligible to hold the office.
4 posted on
10/22/2009 8:10:14 AM PDT by
SvenMagnussen
(Clever tagline can only be seen on the other internet.)
To: Exmachina
To: Exmachina
I’m a Constitutionalist; I have long agreed with your assessment that both parties contribute equally to our progress on the road to serfdom.
7 posted on
10/22/2009 10:03:26 AM PDT by
LambSlave
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson