Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Anita1
provided two thirds of the Senators present concur

This is the part that bothers me, especially with the current crop of traitors that we have in power, who knows what they'll pull.

We have yet begun to fight the real fight, imo

31 posted on 10/17/2009 12:00:49 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Obama's Blackberry, who's on the other end?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Las Vegas Ron; ALOHA RONNIE

Thank you - that is what I am concerned about!


33 posted on 10/17/2009 12:06:02 PM PDT by Anita1 ("Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Ron
provided two thirds of the Senators present concur

This is the part that bothers me, especially with the current crop of traitors that we have in power, who knows what they'll pull.

It's even worse... You only need 50% + 1 of the elected Senators present to make a quorum. Meaning you can get 51 of the Democrats together, and you have a quorum. Then 2/3rds of them have to agree - 34.

People don't realize that it only takes 34 Senators to ratify a treaty, if they are members of the party in power. The ONLY thing that could stop it would be a filibuster where you delay action in the Senate on anything. But with a filibuster-proof majority, the Democrats can ratify this treaty with just 34 votes.

There are at least 34 completely-safe seats that can vote for this...

47 posted on 10/17/2009 1:13:19 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson