Ahhhhhhhhhhhh . . .
yes . . . your criteria is sooooooooo impressive . . .
those things courts usually don’t allow inevidence because they are
soooooooooo chronically sooooooooooooo inaccurate.
Real impressive criteria you have there.
Don’t hold your breath. I haven’t found most naysayers or their arguments the least bit motivating to get back to.
And your criteria for believing these “witnesses” other than you just want to ?
Do you think they’d be willing to make a statement under oath ?