Frankly, we don’t know with certainty where The One was born. If he was born in Hawaii, it is curious that he won’t release his long form certificate...wonder why?
What could be on it? Has to be something that is at least, very embarrassing.
*******
On Obama's short form birth certificate that we see on the internet, there is this phrase stamped on the bottom:
"Date filed by registrar" and the date "Aug. 8,1961."
1. "Date accepted by registrar": But as I understand it---and from what I have seen on other Hawaii birth certificates displayed on the internet---a valid Hawaii birth certificate up to at least 1985 should have the following: "Date accepted by registrar".
2. As I understand it, the phrase "Date filed by registrar" could mean that the person was not born in a hospital.
3. One question I have is this: If Obama's birth certificate has a "Date filed by registrar" of "Aug. 8,1961", at what point in the past 50 was Obama's 1961 birth certificate moved up into the more legally important category of "Date accepted by registrar"?
4. My point is this: If the Obama short form birth certificate we see on the internet has "Date filed by registrar" instead of the more legally important of "Date accepted by registrar", then there is something seriously wrong with the Obama birth certificate, because it only has the worthless "Date filed by registrar."
5. So, in my opinion, resolving the "Date filed by registrar" vs. "Date accepted by registrar" issue could go a long way in answering the question of whether Obama was or was not born in Hawaii.
6. That is, if Hawaii officials are holding an Obama birth certificate with the phrase of "Date accepted by registrar" stamped on it, then it has a moral and ethical duty to release it to the public.
You raise excellent points...have you ever considered asking for a job with the media?
Is it not hard to believe that NO ONE in the mainstream media will look at these questions?
Wonder why?