Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wendy1946
Simple answer: it didn't. That stuff is a few thousand or a couple of tens of thousands of years old at most.

Could be. Some think the soft tissue could be from contamination.

17 posted on 10/03/2009 8:57:01 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62
Could be. Some think the soft tissue could be from contamination.

That's what the methodology chart ( see Post #4 above ) seems to be saying.
18 posted on 10/03/2009 8:59:04 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (wH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

That’s been thoroughly debunked. The tissue is definitely and obviously that of the dinosaur. No kind of contamination could produce blood vessels and hemoglobin inside of bones.


19 posted on 10/03/2009 9:27:21 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson