Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/01/2009 1:46:51 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Yeah, but will it run Duke Nukem without hanging?


3 posted on 10/01/2009 1:53:54 PM PDT by Islander7 (If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
CNET :

Nvidia gives first look at next-gen Fermi GPU

*******************EXCERPT***********************

October 1, 2009 5:49 AM PDT

We wish we could provide you with information like clock speeds, shipping dates, and prices for 3D cards using Nvidia's new graphics architecture, code-named "Fermi." Instead, all we've been able to garner from the various reports around the Web from Nvidia's preview event is that Nvidia is pushing the parallel computing capabilities of its new chip harder than ever.

If you really want to get into the dirty architectural details, Anandtech, PC Perspective, and the Tech Report each have multipage stories that dig into the information Nvidia unveiled so far. From a gaming perspective, the most significant features Nvidia mentioned are that Fermi will indeed support DirectX 11, and that it will use GDDR5 memory. Those features answer two of AMD's most obvious advantages with its new Radeon HD 5800-series cards, but Nvidia hasn't provided information on availability, which remains AMD's most important edge.

Gaming was not the primary topic of the day with Fermi, however. Instead Nvidia focused most heavily on its CUDA GPU computing technology as it relates to its Tesla, enterprise-class product family. AnandTech reports that Nvidia cited one bragging point about a company using its previous generation GT200 chips to migrate "a cluster of 2000 servers to 32 Tesla S1070s, bringing total costs down from $8M to $400K, and total power from 1200kW down to 45kW." Nvidia hasn't mentioned clock speed figures for Fermi, so we can't predict its performance just yet, but as PC Perspective reports, Fermi "is made up of 3.0 billion transistors and features 512 CUDA processing cores organized into 16 streaming multiprocessors of 32 cores each." That's more than twice the core count in the 240-core GT200, so expectations are reasonably high.

6 posted on 10/01/2009 1:59:07 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Two other threads on this Nvidia announcement:

NVIDIA Takes GPU Computing to the Next Level

And:

NVIDIA's Fermi: Architected for Tesla, 3 Billion Transistors in 2010

9 posted on 10/01/2009 2:03:08 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind

Oak Ridge seems to have signed up.


10 posted on 10/01/2009 2:06:57 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=116466&p=irol-IRHome

Could be a good day to buy.


11 posted on 10/01/2009 2:14:52 PM PDT by right way right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I bet i’d get about 17,975 FPS on my Battlefield 2142 game with this.

AWESOME!!!!!

No really, This sounds sweet.
Sounds like Intel should be a little worried.


12 posted on 10/01/2009 2:18:46 PM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson