Believers in extra terrestrials are obligated to provide proof for their views. That’s how it works in science. You propose a theory and then you must move your theory to fact with solid evidence. You are doing what evolutionists do, they claim some as fact when it isn’t yet proved, then attack anyone who questions them as being uninformed, a rube, or ignorant.
Now, please, please, don’t just send me a million links to a bunch of goofy UFO websites, or a lot of eyewitness testimonials about abductions. Show me some solid evidence. How about a picture of a real ET, or a genuine (clear, not blurry) picture of an alien craft. Just because a former astronaut believes it doesn’t make it so.
I have pointed you to solid tangible scientifically verified evidence, from more than 3,000 cases where the craft left tangible evidence in the environment.
I realize you seem to have a genetic predisposition to avoiding drinking the water when it’s provided.
I don’t observe you to be the least bit interested in truth in the matter.
You seem to be much more interested in maintaining your death grip on your biases and on your TYPE II ERROR HAZARDS.
The reaping will be very fascinating.
A former astronaut? I can think of one more at least -- Gordon Cooper. His bio, "Leap of Faith," is mostly NOT about UFOs, but a small portion of it is. And you know something? I give Gordo and Mitchell a lot more credibility than an anonymous internet poster, even if he/she IS a FReeper ...
... especially someone who says, "show me a picture and then maybe I'll believe you," when EVERYONE knows that no matter how clear the photo, no matter how realistic "a picture of a real ET," there's not a snowball's chance IN HELL that you would EVER consider either one authentic. You would continue to call them frauds and fakes, AND YOU KNOW IT. After posting such fraudulent drivel as what I quote above from your post, you actually think that you're more deserving of consideration than at least two men who were professional space explorers?
Talk about deluded.