Jones’ presence as White House “czar” brings into question the entire czar system. As well it should, as we should be skeptical of unvetted and unaccountable functionaries in the White House.
The US voters' representatives in Congress have not been allowed the opportunity to question these czars' credentials before open committee. Keeping the Congress and the US citizenry in the dark (note: opposite of transparency) about important, Department-head appointees is part of the Constitutional protections that are being subverted. IMHO, these subversions of the Constitution violate BHO's Presidential Oath to uphold the Constitution, and are therefore impeachable transgressions on his part.
Congress specifically authorizes certain monies to be spent by these Departments, a function of money spending which has at least partly been overtaken by these czars, which weaks the protections we have under the Constitution.
That an avowed Communist with stronger anti-US allegiances than pro-US, such as Van Jones, can take over the money-disbursing reins of the US Government is wholly against the best-laid plans of those signers of the Constitution. That 0bama has in considered fashion done this shows Barry Soetero to be an enemy of the Constitution.
And that enemy of the Constitution needs to resign his office more quickly than Van Jones did.
HF