Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

I never said that standing was a law. Technically it is a doctrine.

***

And a doctrine has no force or effect of law ...


521 posted on 09/07/2009 8:31:44 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies ]


To: Lmo56

If a judge dismisses a case for lack of standing, he has ruled that the plaintiff has no legal right to bring the suit. That’s force and effect in my book.


537 posted on 09/07/2009 8:55:04 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies ]

To: Lmo56; BuckeyeTexan
"And a doctrine has no force or effect of law ..."

I have no idea what that even means.

There are dozens and dozens of legal doctrines that are fully articulated in American jurisprudence and specifically common law. To say a doctrine established by precedent "has no force or effect of law", just couldn't be more inaccurate.

548 posted on 09/07/2009 9:16:35 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson