I’ll take my dad’s word....He graduated at the top of his law class and clerked in the Federal Court...It is a procedural tools used by the court not a law.
***
Prior to Frothingham v. Mellon (1923), ordinary citizens always had standing to challenge alleged violations of the Constitution ...
The case of standing is that there are allegations of a fraudulant election. We have a right to have an honest election. The abridgement of that right by fraud injures at least every voter who did not vote for the suspect and by extension even those who did. A rights violation injures all of those whose rights were violated.
Interesting --