Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosiermama

Fair enough.

The DOJ represents the government in all legal matters. The DOJ must defend federal law. The DOJ must also defend the interests of the government.

Personal actions, to me, would reflect actions taken by someone that are outside of or irrelevant to one’s official duties. So yes, the DOJ would not be expected to defend those actions.

However, one’s negligence in performing one’s duties would not be a personal action because the action/inaction is directly relevant to one’s official duties. Negligence is the failure to act when one is obligated to do so.


357 posted on 09/07/2009 4:10:04 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan
Failure to defend the constitution against enemies from within IS a personal choice not a job description; therefore, they should be paying their own bills, not being defended at tax payer expense.
363 posted on 09/07/2009 4:18:23 PM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson