NO, Just trying to figure out where a freeper loses contact with why the DOJ should not be defending BO in this case.
THE DOJ is an attorney for the defence of a government office.....Do you understand that?
Are you suggesting that if a fraud were perpetrated before Obama had the office, Obama now has the benefit of civil servant lawyers?
Truly, we have entered the Twilight one.
The guy commits a crime and then has the government defend him?
As FU’d up as everything around this guy is, it wouldn’t surprise me one bit if he gets away with it.
***
Well, someone could really roil things up if they request that Holder institute a motion for a writ quo warranto ...
If he doesn’t do it, they can ask the same of the U.S. Attorney for DC ...
Its an either/or deal - only one has to consent ... Which would be funny - since the Justice Dept. would be prosecuting it’s own boss (Obama) ...
If neither consent, a third party can go ahead and file the motion on behalf of the United States ...
No need for the AG or the US Attorney, since they had their chance ...