[nufsed]

I am not arguing with NS. His name is indicative of much of what he does on this issue. I usually jump in to point out that he is repeating questions or statements which have been countered over and over. Readers can take that to mean what they want.

I did jump in today because he posted many paragraphs and some one inexplicably said they agreed with every word. It is unimaginable, so I had to provide that person a way to retract such a bewildering statement.

[Kevmo]

Readers can take that to mean what they want.
***Well, I take it to mean that you suggest nonsequitur is an issue-specific troll. The mods have recently come full circle on that issue. Originally the definition of “troll” was posted by a mod but even during that thread, they did not follow the definition. And JimRob even told me and LJ to stop troll hunting. But after months of putting up with the nonsequiterian nonsense from one troll, they finally told her to stop posting on these threads.

I’m glad to see the definition posted is the definition being used, finally.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2165967/posts