Is America all about DUE PROCESS?
0bama’s D0J is running scared.
Why is the DOJ weighing in on this so called “non issue”?
..... and .....
because the dozens of plaintiffs can't show they are directly injured by Obama's presence in office.
DOJ sounds fishy to me.....
Tally ho! This is significant! When before has the DOJ been involved in any altercation concerning the BC? If nothing else, this makes the SRM even more derelict if they won’t report.
“the dozens of plaintiffs can’t show they are directly injured by Obama’s presence in office.”
Really? I doubt that that’s true.
In any case, Is everyone in the DOJ involved in a giant coverup? It makes no sense. There’s a law governing qualifications for president but no way to enforce that law?
Because the plaintiff lacks the standing to sue. Same reason why all the other cases have been tossed.
“”It is clear, from the text of the Constitution, and the relevant statutory law implementing the Constitution’s textual commitments, that challenges to the qualifications of a candidate for President can, in the first instance, be presented to the voting public before the election, and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in the Congress,” Assistant United States Attorneys Roger West and David DeJute wrote. “Therefore, challenges such as those purportedly raised in this case are committed, under the Constitution, to the electors, and to the Legislative branch.”
In other words, “You didn’t get us to court before he was sworn in, too late! Obama won.”
I think as time wears on, this is not going to be seen as a ‘conspiracy theory’ that Obama wants it made out to be.
Also, this somewhat explains why the Congress is not wanting anything to do with this. They KNOW they should have vetted him before casting the electoral votes and they didn’t.
Also, any update on the last sentence?
("..since a couple of plaintiffs in the case are now in a dispute with Taitz and have sought to bring in a different attorney to represent them in the case.")
The DOJ should not be involved. Obama should have private attorneys fighting this. Orly needs to get someone to proof read her filings.
Why are **government** lawyers involved. Please note that plural. LawyerSSSS! Why should the American taxpayer being paying for Obama’s defense?
Just release the $15 birth certificate!
Wow! This steams me.
ping!
In my limited legal experience, a motion to dismiss is standard MO.
No proof of harm? A bank book or a brokerage statement should be proof enough. Next year, 1040 tax tables ought to do it as well.
Yeah big shocker. Why would we expect anything less from this usurper fraud...
Every April 15th the federal government collects tax receipts.
This is done under direction of Criminal Obama as CEO.
As he's not lawfully President this is how many counts of theft from one private citizen by another private citizen?
More to the point - can anybody explain how Criminal Obama’s taking tax revenue is NOT an individual injury?
Just wondering.
So the DOJ won’t prosecute Black Panthers who intimidate voters with nightsticks, but WILL protect a president from the necessity of satisfying constitutional requirements. Ain’t it great to live in a formerly free country??!!
Damn good question. If there was nothing there, why would they waste the time and resources to fight it even before it gets to court?
he DOJ doth protest too much, methinks.
One can argue strategy, but this seems to me to be a very odd one.
Why not simply produce all of the vital records from Hawaii, if those exist, and simply quash the questions about the Kenyan Clown's birthplace?