Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

Since dark pigment is a dominate phenotype, your theory doesn’t make much sense. The only way that this could happen is in a community in which female would have to produce a generation in which every offspring had a recessive genotype mutation. Not only that, this generation would have to be completely isolated from sexual intercourse from all other people, including the previous generation. How likely is that?


53 posted on 09/02/2009 1:16:11 PM PDT by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Nosterrex
Dark pigmentation is, first of all, not a strict dominance/recessive trait and not controlled by a single gene. So you are completely off base right off the bat. A dark skinned and light skinned person do not have a child as dark as the dark skinned parent; the colors blend.

Moreover you have no idea how dominance/recessive traits work, even if it WAS applicable, which it is not.

All it would take for a black population to become a white population due to vitamin D deficiency from living in a northern climate is a slight reproductive advantage towards being even slightly lighter skinned for a couple thousand years.

A lighter skinned individual in northern climates where vitamin D could be a problem DO have a reproductive advantage over those darker skinned individual who would develop rickets from vitamin D deficiency.

61 posted on 09/02/2009 1:27:28 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson