[opentalk]

If the organization’s secrecy should be breached, simply smoke screen it with ridicule and laugh-ability, standing tall with indignity, bellowing loudly to ensure the plebs acquiesce to your “sound judgment” that has been carefully tailored as the sound of authority; supplant as many conspiracy theory jokes as you can to take the focus off true investigation, lest someone actually discover the inner layers of the organizational onion and expose the ugly face of reality to the light. And if anyone gets too close in their investigation, discredit them and create fictional forms of malcontent and debauchery to ensure a through aura of unbelievably around the investigator (again, to take focus off the true investigation and to sidetrack and derail truth-finding). And if investigators still get too close, then throw them a sacrificial lamb—expendable scapegoats to keep the public’s attention of the true villain wielding all the power—the top tier.

[Beloved Levinite]

bttt

[Dick Bachert]

The same gaggle of oligarchs are smack in the middle of the UN Bravo Sierra.

Some essential history if you are to fully grasp the rot – and the plot — at the core of this thoroughly corrupt gaggle of over-educated morons for whom Obamessiah is the poster boy:

ORIGINS OF THE UN, PART 1:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAzl21AfnZU

ORIGINS OF THE UN, PART 2:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0qV2OM8ajQ

ORIGINS OF THE UN, PART 3:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrkshIXYiPs

[NRA2BFree]

one cannot simply threaten or bribe everyone, so what can be done to usurp authority and control over it?

Elect Barrack Obama!

[opentalk]

Napolitano, Geithner, Summers, Gates, Obama, Hillary CFR members

(article excerpt): ..control the remaining 90% of the US leadership, hence government. This, claim the pundits, is precisely why the US leadership has done and continues to do things that seem anti-American or anti-common sense, such as promoting illegal immigration, and open borders and much more.

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

The linked article quotes (and seems to agree with) Noam Chomsky, who is a “libertarian socialist.” Weird.

“Libertarian sociaists” seem to advocate the abolition of private property.