I have no use for those who remain upon the fence this late in the game.
I am not presenting an argument either.
I am attacking my enemy, as well as an enemy of my country.
As I stated, she is insane. Her inability to understand something as simple as her own gender identity also illustrates that she is incapable of understanding complex issues, such as our country being destroyed from within by stealth communists.
I do not believe that gays, either male or female, should be given position of power or trust, because their obsessive insanity as it relates to their own self image causes them to be dangerously paranoid, i.e. Janet Napolitano.
If you want to see the result of such insanity being allowed to run amok, then you need look no further than San Fransicko. Homosexuality is being promoted, and it is out of control in this country. It destroys the family unit, and that is a necessary step in this silent, communist revolution.
I will attack it, and I do not care if it offends you or anyone else.
Thanks for taking the time to articulate you opinion.
To be clear, you did not offend me in the least. My point was that I think you will not convince anyone to move towards your line of thinking by name calling. Since your stated goal is to attack your enemy and not influence those who remain upon the fence your responses make perfect sense.
I think you will influence few if any to move towards conservatism. The net effect of you efforts will zero in my opinion.
By and large I agree with your opinion, I just do not agree with your approach, because, I think it does not advance the conservative agenda.