Why should I get a fight?
Correction- what you WILL get, because there are a number of facts, some which I cite, that get in the way of the article’s conclusions. I do wish what passes for “science” would at least stand the rigors of tested hypothesis. “Consensus” does not exist in science, but it is often used to justify other proveably incorrect hypotheses, like anthropogenic global warming. When confronted, they just change the terminology to “climate change” ‘cause who could argue with that?