Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kleon
Ding ding ding! We have a winner!

A U.S. citizen at birth is a natural born citizen, as opposed to a naturalized citizen.

In U.S. vs Wong Kim Ark it was found that the child of two Chinese nationals born in territory under the jurisdiction of the USA was natural born.

So far from needing two U.S. citizen parents to be natural born, one needn't have either parent be a U.S. citizen; so long as by the natural act of being born one has U.S. citizenship conveyed upon them.

But the correct answer isn't always what people want to hear.

45 posted on 08/26/2009 1:07:21 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

“But the correct answer isn’t always what people want to hear.”

You’re right there, but your interpretation of US v Wong Kim Ark and your understanding of “natural born citizen” and “citizen by birth” are a bit off.

The Wong court only determined that the child was a ‘citizen by birth.’ The generation of ‘anchor babies’ being born today to illegal aliens are not ‘natural born citizens,’ although they are, in fact, ‘citizens by birth.’ Their parents are not citizens of the USA and they are, therefore, NOT ‘natural born citizens.’


153 posted on 08/26/2009 9:52:00 PM PDT by EDINVA (A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson