[MHGinTN]

You disgusting obamanoids are really coming unglued! ... Now, you are contradicting the founders, as if their founding means nothing to you obamanoids ... and then again, to your ilk it really is of no regards!
Obama was born with dual citizenship, yes. That does not make him any less of a natural born citizen, though.
A person of another nationality is precisely NOT a natural born American. And agitprops like you even contradict your own reasoning ... you brought up that one can lose citizenship if choosing a different citizenship, so dual is eliminated in your own argument, fool! Then, with natural born, there is the ultimate elimination by reason of the very quote you tried to fracture from John Jay!

Carry on, fool, you're getting quite amusing in your fraudulency. It is amusing to watch a fool pretend to be wise, and all reading your posts except you can see your deceits unfold.

[Technical Editor]

The following is the holding of the U.S. Supreme Court. There is no clearer statement of the issue of who is natural born than this.

U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. v. WONG KIM ARK, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

“It thus clearly appears that by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country, and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, and the jurisdiction of the English sovereign; and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject, unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign state, or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.

“III. The same rule was in force in all the English colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the constitution as originally established.”