Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RegulatorCountry

“Natural born” comes from English common law.

You totally misunderstand what SR 511 meant. He was born outside the United States (Panama was NOT U.S. soil, nor is any military base of the U.S. in a foreign country; Panama was LEASED to the U.S.). The federal law at the time of his birth was that a child born abroad of two U.S. citizens is a citizen at birth. That’s all SR 511 said. It simply affirmed the provision of the law that existed in 1936, which as a matter of fact, is the same provision in TODAY’S law regarding the status of children born outside the U.S. to two U.S. citizens.

See http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1401.html.


302 posted on 08/28/2009 7:08:31 PM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]


To: Technical Editor
Natural born subject comes from English common law ... you know, subject to the monarchy and all that.

Interesting, that you think our Founders would defer to such a concept.

I don't misunderstand a thing, as far as that ludicrous SR 511 is concerned. It was a collegial effort to provide cover fot one of their own, Constitution be damned, that's what it was.

314 posted on 08/28/2009 8:01:22 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson