Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream
Nice try, that's one discussion, not the majority decision:

The evident intention, and the necessary effect, of the submission of this case to the decision of the court upon the facts agreed by the parties, were to present for determination the single question, stated at the beginning of this opinion, namely, whether a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States. For the reasons above stated, this court is of opinion that the question must be answered in the affirmative.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=169&invol=649

275 posted on 08/27/2009 2:06:07 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]


To: rolling_stone

The majority decision found that he was a citizen at birth and thus a natural born citizen.


276 posted on 08/27/2009 2:09:11 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson