Skip to comments.
Face to face with the 5,000-year-old 'first Scot'
The Scotsman ^
| Friday, August 21, 2009
| Frank Urquhart
Posted on 08/20/2009 5:58:55 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: NCC-1701
I can't stop thinking about chocolate tonight.
21
posted on
08/20/2009 8:57:30 PM PDT
by
Daffynition
("...... we are about to be czarred and fettered." ~ alterum ictum faciam.)
To: SunkenCiv
Maybe it was a chess piece.
I truly hate the rubbish these researchers types come up with to explain the things they find. Bunch of generational elitist baloney.
22
posted on
08/20/2009 9:03:52 PM PDT
by
TruthConquers
(Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
To: snarks_when_bored
"Scottish tartan goes way, way back, it seems! "Back further than you'd expect. These folks (The Mummies Of Urumchi) had tartan too.
23
posted on
08/20/2009 9:58:54 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
Interesting mummies, blam; I don't recall reading about them before. They're not quite as old as the Scottish figurine, though (4500 to 5000 years old):
Dating as far back as 4,000 years, they were made by accident--naturally--by the dry climate in the salty Tarim basin. The oldest mummies from Cherchen found so far died about 3,000 years ago, while the oldest mummies found near Loulan died about 4,000 years ago.
To: SunkenCiv
They kilt the last guy who said that. ;)
Ha'e ye no shame, laddie?
To: snarks_when_bored
"Interesting mummies, blam; I don't recall reading about them before."Covered here in 2001.
The Curse Of The Redheaded Mummy
"They're not quite as old as the Scottish figurine, though (4500 to 5000 years old): "
Yup. Not as old...I was astonished about their location. The author of the book, The Mummies Of Urumchi, Elizabeth Barber is a fabric expert and she said that the weave, mfg techniques, ect were exactly like those used in Scotland.
26
posted on
08/20/2009 10:28:12 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
Thanks for the link to your 2003 post. I’ll read it soon...
To: Salamander; SunkenCiv; Slings and Arrows; All
"Careful examination revealed a face with heavy brows, two dots for eyes and an oblong for a nose."
28
posted on
08/20/2009 11:18:22 PM PDT
by
shibumi
(" ..... then we will fight in the shade.")
To: shibumi
Poor guy - he had to wait thousands of years to have the English to hate.
To: SunkenCiv
Did he have a blue silk ribbon?
To: Cailleach
Well, he is called ‘first Scot’... ;’)
31
posted on
08/21/2009 3:43:34 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: snarks_when_bored
I claymore attention that way.
32
posted on
08/21/2009 4:45:54 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: TruthConquers
Chess doesn’t go back that far, but it could be a game piece of some sort.
33
posted on
08/21/2009 4:51:21 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: SunkenCiv
I was wondering how far back chess was considered to exist.
So, how do they decide if it was a chess piece unless they find a mostly complete set, how would they know?
34
posted on
08/22/2009 12:41:58 PM PDT
by
TruthConquers
(Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
To: TruthConquers
Probably it’s a ceramic toy soccer player. ;’)
35
posted on
08/22/2009 8:23:10 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson