Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Face to face with the 5,000-year-old 'first Scot'
The Scotsman ^ | Friday, August 21, 2009 | Frank Urquhart

Posted on 08/20/2009 5:58:55 PM PDT by SunkenCiv

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: NCC-1701
I can't stop thinking about chocolate tonight.


21 posted on 08/20/2009 8:57:30 PM PDT by Daffynition ("...... we are about to be czarred and fettered." ~ alterum ictum faciam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Maybe it was a chess piece.

I truly hate the rubbish these researchers types come up with to explain the things they find. Bunch of generational elitist baloney.


22 posted on 08/20/2009 9:03:52 PM PDT by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
"Scottish tartan goes way, way back, it seems! "

Back further than you'd expect. These folks (The Mummies Of Urumchi) had tartan too.

23 posted on 08/20/2009 9:58:54 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam
Interesting mummies, blam; I don't recall reading about them before. They're not quite as old as the Scottish figurine, though (4500 to 5000 years old):
Dating as far back as 4,000 years, they were made by accident--naturally--by the dry climate in the salty Tarim basin. The oldest mummies from Cherchen found so far died about 3,000 years ago, while the oldest mummies found near Loulan died about 4,000 years ago.

24 posted on 08/20/2009 10:11:03 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
They kilt the last guy who said that. ;’)

Ha'e ye no shame, laddie?

25 posted on 08/20/2009 10:13:12 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
"Interesting mummies, blam; I don't recall reading about them before."

Covered here in 2001.

The Curse Of The Redheaded Mummy

"They're not quite as old as the Scottish figurine, though (4500 to 5000 years old): "

Yup. Not as old...I was astonished about their location. The author of the book, The Mummies Of Urumchi, Elizabeth Barber is a fabric expert and she said that the weave, mfg techniques, ect were exactly like those used in Scotland.

26 posted on 08/20/2009 10:28:12 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: blam

Thanks for the link to your 2003 post. I’ll read it soon...


27 posted on 08/20/2009 10:55:05 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Salamander; SunkenCiv; Slings and Arrows; All
"Careful examination revealed a face with heavy brows, two dots for eyes and an oblong for a nose."


28 posted on 08/20/2009 11:18:22 PM PDT by shibumi (" ..... then we will fight in the shade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

Poor guy - he had to wait thousands of years to have the English to hate.


29 posted on 08/20/2009 11:34:20 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Crazy is the new sane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Did he have a blue silk ribbon?


30 posted on 08/21/2009 4:27:46 AM PDT by Cailleach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cailleach

Well, he is called ‘first Scot’... ;’)


31 posted on 08/21/2009 3:43:34 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

I claymore attention that way.


32 posted on 08/21/2009 4:45:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers

Chess doesn’t go back that far, but it could be a game piece of some sort.


33 posted on 08/21/2009 4:51:21 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I was wondering how far back chess was considered to exist.

So, how do they decide if it was a chess piece unless they find a mostly complete set, how would they know?


34 posted on 08/22/2009 12:41:58 PM PDT by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers

Probably it’s a ceramic toy soccer player. ;’)


35 posted on 08/22/2009 8:23:10 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson