[Danae]

It pings all that have posted to the thread or been pinged previously to it. That is how it was explained to me. Polartik got pinged at post 45, again at post 165. After I apologized, LucyT posted up this:

To: Danae; Jim Robinson; MHGinTN; Polarik; MestaMachine; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; ...

MHGinTN you have my apology.

Polarik you have my apology.

Your apology is appreciated.

216 posted on Friday, July 31, 2009 7:51:22 PM by LucyT

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

++++++++++

You poor buggers just can't admit it, that again says more about you than I does me.

MHGinTN you have my apology.

Polarik you have my apology.

Your apology is appreciated.

[Fred Nerks]

You poor buggers just can't admit it, that again says more about you than I does me.

To: Danae; Jim Robinson; MHGinTN; Polarik; MestaMachine; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; ... MHGinTN you have my apology. Polarik you have my apology

now that you have pointed that out, I do recall that ping from LucyT. I recall thinking, well that's a relief, the bickering should be behind us now...but that was not to be, obviously.

How can you follow up an apology with continued attacks? Seems you regret making the apology.

[BuckeyeTexan]

Please kindly explain to Danae the concept of posting a comment to “All” on a thread. She believes that FR software pings everyone who ever posted on that thread or was pinged to it.

I’d like to see that source code logic. That’s some recursive code execution, baby. Fork those processes! *grins*