Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Danae
You said you got it in 2001, it has a 2007 stamp, and you insisted that yours proved that Hawaii stamped the wrong date on forms, and that in turn proved that the FactChuck document could be genuine.

Yours was indeed fake, in terms of its provenance, the claims you made simply could not be true.

And by the way, Polarik was correct in his appraisal that it was not a genuine 2001 vintage document, as your finding the actual receipt did indeed demonstrate.

157 posted on 08/09/2009 9:07:57 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 200 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: null and void

Bo. I said it was ordered in 2000. Which is exactly what I remembered.

It is not a fake, and never was. I was erroneous in my recollections. When I found that out, I owned up to it.

Polarik was nothing short of viscous in his post. He NOT ONCE reminded me to send more scans, which was a simple over-site on my part and was immediately corrected. He never apologized for calling me a fraud. I think that’s out of line.

My COLB is in no way a fake Null. and repeating that BS again only makes you look like a... well a jerk.

I owned up to an honest mistake and provided proof of my mistake. Thats called being and acting like an adult. How about you and Polarik (well after his Opus never mind) try doing just a wee bit of that yourselves?


161 posted on 08/09/2009 9:14:48 PM PDT by Danae (- Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson