>you have never met Judge Carter. He speaks his mind and has no fear of refering to nuances which have prevented the case from being heard till now.<
Thank god!
Taking her recent past as guide, it is likely that Dr. Taitz has been too enthusiastic in her characterization of what the Judge said in the hearing. He was basically allowing the U.S. Attorney for the area to receive the serving on the case that was misinterpreted back in January when the pres__ent was initially served. Orly may have heard more than was said, reading between the lines so to speak. But you have to applaud her tenacity in continuing to pound this issue! ... If you believe the Constitution needs to be enforced at this late hour.