I some instasnces the Judge might accede to view teh documents first and decide at that point whther to allow Orly t see them or make a ruling as to admissibility. The truth would be out.
The only thing now in teh way is Obama’s first Executive Order as President which was to order all his personal papers sealed from being viewed by anyone.
Obama’s first executive order was to hide all his personal papers? I didn’t know that.
I was on the Wa Post site reading the disgusting comments about Sarah’s article and most of them were “Sarah didn’t write this”. Of course they have no way of confirming this. But the thing is, what have we seen that zero has written? He gives mostly teleprompter speeches and they all love him but Sarah writes an article that made a lot of sense and their big accusation is she didn’t write it.
I sure hope we aren’t too far gone to come back from where we are.
>The only thing now in teh way is Obama’s first Executive Order as President which was to order all his personal papers sealed from being viewed by anyone.<
true, but her suit was filed before he took office.
Good question, but I do not think that he can keep the documents under seal prior to that. The court could determine without little argument that the order was to cover his activity.
It is an argument though and one that may very well come up.
lets hope that the court has the power to overturn the executive order.
But when he continues to refuse them unsealed, then what???