Some years ago the theory of the gay gene was promulgated by a very respected professor from one of the elite California universities.
At the time, the gay community hated that idea. It was a ‘choice of lifestyle’ issue they said. They were gay by choice and proud of it. The attacks by the gays and thier liberal/left sympathizers about ran the professor out of the liberal and academic community as a homophobe or something.
Then their attitude and that of the MSM changed when HIV came to the attention of the public in the 80s. The only way to get funding for research was to portray themselves as helpless victims of their genetic code, because otherwise they could just change their ‘choice of lifestyle” to avoid the plague. NO gay gene, no money.
And of course the liberal elite and the grant chasers jumped on the gay gene bandwagon.
You might want to investigate these countervailing arguments and what motivates them.
Interesting, I never thought about that before. Thanks.