 |
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
“...probably due to warming...” Ah, yes. Another claim based on nothing attributed to a fraud. Must be the left at work!
|
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
The prospect of additional warming ? because of greenhouse gases ? means that situation could happen even sooner.
Why do the authors poison their own research, which in itself is certainly interesting i.e. the movement of the ITCZ over time, with that selected phrase and its bigoted implication of AGW?
Are these legitimate scientists? If so shouldn't they then have to confirm there is such a thing as AGW, or that any GW whatsoever is a result of greenhouse gases rather than the converse, if they are gong to implicate it in a technical paper?
But they do not. Meaning to us they really are fraudulent actors, to the point that one can't even trust their research.
In a very real way this is the psychological mindset of the Left, that is, a bandwagon of unknowing bigots.
As a college instructor I can verify that such limited mindsets pervade academia.
“The prospect of additional warming because of greenhouse gases means that situation could happen even sooner.
The findings suggest “that increasing greenhouse gases could potentially shift the primary band of precipitation in the tropics with profound implications for the societies and economies that depend on it,” the article says. “
Stoped reading after that. GW propaganda BS