Replies

Thanks.

Will read it.

My view of Friedman vs Boylan . . .

IIRC . . . Boylan has had some serious detractors . . .

However, it’s never been easy to tell . . . were the detractors disinfo folks seeding his reputation with contrary stuff ??? Or was he a questionable character on his own.

Also . . . regardless of his character etc. were some of the things he said true? Was it mostly disinfo?

I’ve tended to think he probably outted some stuff at least somewhat on his own initiative. But it’s been a long time since I went over his stuff.

I’ve met Friedman at 2-3 conferences and asked him questions at some length and observed a number of presentations by him. I think his character is one of the most solid in all the field.

On the other hand, he seems to have bought into the delusion that the fallen angels are good critters. That’s utter BS. They are in cahoots with the oligarchy toward setting up the satanic global government.

So, is Stanton Friedman a . . . sleeper on behalf of the globalists in the UFO arena? . . . a paid agent? He certainly has the background that would qualify him to be so.

Or has he just blithely and ignorantly gone along with the ideas that the critters are wonderful. He is not NORMALLY given to a lack of thoughtfulness and carefulness in such matters so that seems a bit of a stretch.

Hey—it’s all smoke and mirrors . . . except for what isn’t! LOL.

Thanks.