Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek
Actually less massive dinosaurs makes the most sense.

It does to me. With less mass they are more agile and need less food to maintain their mass.

15 posted on 06/24/2009 4:51:09 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: decimon

Agreed about the lighter Dino’s. This solves a few conundrums in paleontology about bone size (tail bones and femurs). They just couldn’t seem to get things to add up correctly. It will be interesting to see if this pans out.


19 posted on 06/24/2009 5:07:43 AM PDT by Paradox (When the left have no one to villainize, they'll turn on each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson