Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: devane617

“From what I can find, the taxes that were to be levied via the required tax stamps were inconsequential...”

What brought you to that conclusion? Everything I’ve read has quite the opposite conclusion.


3 posted on 06/15/2009 6:54:58 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kirkwood

later


4 posted on 06/15/2009 6:59:49 PM PDT by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Kirkwood

It was levied on paper used for official documents. If you bought or sold anything needing paperwork to complete, it required a tax. Real Estate, imports, exports...

But it was much more...there were several acts in addition to the stamp act that during those times resulted in unrest...

One example, certain imports had to pass through England, or pay fees to England to be sold or purchased in the colonies, such as tea.

Why could the colonists sell their goods wehereever they wanted?

It is if avery sale overseas had to pay governor Shwartzenegger a tax of a certain percentage, even if you were from New York. They paid this tax to the King, even to buy rum from Jamaica, if they were being legal about it.


23 posted on 06/18/2009 7:38:40 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson